Peer-reviewed articles 17,970 +


Title: DELIBERATIVE ECONOMIC VALUATION METHODS TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON URBAN INFRASTRUCTURES
DELIBERATIVE ECONOMIC VALUATION METHODS TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON URBAN INFRASTRUCTURES

PlumX Article Metrics by Elsevier
Rocco Murro
10.5593/sgem2024/5.1/s21.59
10.5593/sgem2024/5.1
1314-2704
978-619-7603-72-9
English
24
5.1
•    Prof. DSc. Oleksandr Trofymchuk, UKRAINE 
•    Prof. Dr. hab. oec. Baiba Rivza, LATVIA
Environmental Economics
Consequences of climate change have social, economic and environmental effects. Changes in weather patterns directly impact to transport infrastructures, which play a strategic role in emergency management. Calamitous events as consequence of weather and climatic processes raise the need to foresee adaptation measures to climate change, which is already in place. Although there is a large literature on the effects of climate change, individual and collective responses and behaviours are unclear to such changes.
Infrastructures are urban community goods, so adaptation actions concern values and preferences that affect the community itself. In order to measure these values, it is appropriate to consider the impacts (understood as the interpretation of the effects) perceived by communities, but most of the conventional evaluation approaches show obvious limitations.
The paper proposes to use inclusive processes, based on the theory of deliberative democracy, in the economic judgments of value and choice in the field of climate change and the adaptation measures related to urban infrastructures. Given the series of effects climate change generates on a single infrastructure and the related adaptation measures, the procedures proposed in this paper enable the members of the community involved to: a) appraise the Shared Economic Value (SEV) of the impact produced by climate change and the related adaptation measures; b) to obtain a Shared Multi-criteria Judgment of alternative adaptation measures.
[1] Moretti L., Loprencipe G., Climate change and transport infrastructures: State of the art. Sustainability, 10(11), 4098, 2018.
[2] Lichfield N., Economics in urban conservation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
[3] Vanclay F., Esteves A. M., Aucamp I., Franks D., Social impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects, International Association for Impact Assessment, 2015.
[4] Young I. M., Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 2000. Vanclay, F., Esteves, A. M., Aucamp, I., & Franks, D. (2015).
[5] Pateman C., Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, 1970.
[6] Fung A., Wright E. O., Deepening Democracy. Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, Verso, New York, 2003.
[7] Gbikpi B., Dalla teoria della democrazia partecipativa a quella deliberativa: quali possibili continuita, in Stato e Mercato 73 (1), 2005.
[8] Bohmann J., Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity, and democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996.
[9] Elster J., Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
[10] Dryzek J. S., Discursive democracy. Policy, Politics and Political Science, Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
[11] Christie M., Fazey, I., Cooper R., Hyde T. & Kenter J. O., An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies, Ecological Economics, 83, 67–78, 2012.
[12] Kallis G., Gomez-Baggethun E., & Zografos C., To value or not to value? That is not the question, Ecological Economics, 94, 97–105, 2013.
[13] Kenter J. O., Jobstvogt N., Watson V., Irvine K. N., Christie M., Bryce R., The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: Integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling, Ecosystem Services, 21, 270–290, 2016.
[14] Orchard-Webb J., Kenter J. O., Bryce R., Church A., Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach, Ecosystem Services, 21, 308–318, 2016.
[15] Eber N., Willinger M., L’economie experimentale, La Decouverte: Paris, France, 2005.
conference
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/5.1/s21.59
Download PDF
Proceedings of 24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024
24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024, 1 - 7 July, 2024
Proceedings Paper
STEF92 Technology
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM
SWS Scholarly Society; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci and Arts; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; European Acad Sci, Arts and Letters; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia; Croatian Acad Sci and Arts; Acad Sci Moldova; Montenegrin Acad Sci and Arts; Georgian Acad Sci; Acad Fine Arts and Design Bratislava; Russian Acad Arts; Turkish Acad Sci.
461-468
1 - 7 July, 2024
website
10006
Climate change, Deliberative approaches, Inclusive approaches, Shared Economic Value, Shared Multicriteria Analysis.

25th SGEM International Conference on Earth & Planetary Sciences


International GeoConference SGEM2025
27 June - 6 July, 2025 / Albena, Bulgaria

Read More		   

SGEM Vienna GREEN "Green Science for Green Life"


Extended Scientific Sessions SGEM Vienna GREEN
3 -6 December, 2025 / Vienna, Austria

Read More
   

A scientific platform for Art-Inspired Scientists!


The Magical World Where Science meets Art
Vienna, Austria

Read More